In the research I carried out I found different references and interpretations of the concept of shelter. Established (tactical) and continuously evolving (dynamic) interpretations and practices in the course of humanity. Until today. Man with an active survival instinct created, is constantly creating, places of safety/refuge from the natural (weather, climate) and man-made (war, early-late industrial era) risks he had to manage. From the mother's womb to natural caves and artificial huts, it finds and continuously creates group shelters, shelter-cities, where it coexists-survives collectively. Shelter is a temporary adequate security solution/decision that, unexpectedly, can turn into a hostile environment. People divided into groups, into tribes, into slaves, into subjects, into ethnically certain citizens of countries are constantly in conflict with each other. Each time, the weapon technology used creates the need for new stronger shelters. Ideological-aesthetic counterweight to wars and disasters, are the technical-aesthetic expressions where the collective desire for peaceful life is declared. One of these expressions is the cinema which, I believe, has the characteristics of a refuge in a certain space and time. The evolution of cinema (theme, ideological background, viewing, apprenticeship in ideas and criticism) combined with the development of science and technology contributed to the relationship with the broadcast of sequences of images becoming an integral part of the experience (knowledge-participation in culture). . The digital space/shelter that is defined and limited, bounded and extended to and from the screen (ideology projection) and the relations that have emerged and established (political-ideological relations) warn of the coming end of the time of "residence" in this intangible form of shelter and the search for new ideological relations of space and time.