From the early of nineteenth-century to the modern fatigue society, the exhaustion has been charged as proof of cultural syndrome. Analyzed it, we observe that it constituted an offshoot of alienated modernity while praised as the sign to engage in the taxing business. It companied with sloth and inaction and the lack of will. So, what does it mean to be without work? The idleness has been accused as the sin of contemporary way of life. However, according to Aristotle and Agamben the sloth does not mean impotentiality. The impotentiality doesn’t render as non-functionality but as resistance. In art the impotentiality is necessary before it passes into actuality; otherwise it will put down executing a series of things. The example of Bartleby and the protagonists of Beckett represent the meaning of inoperative and exhaustion.  The protagonists of Beckett are unable to see, speak and move. Deleuze realize in Beckett’s plays the depletion of body energy and the exhaustion of possible. The possible is realized through the method of elimination of any preferences. Consequently, the possible will be exhausted when all combinations will be diminished and the self through the procession.  There are four forms of exhaustion: exhaustion of series of things, dry up the flow of voices, extenuate the potentialities of space, and dissipate the image. Beckett eliminates the language, making gaps, trying to recreate a pure form; at the same time disintegrating the body constructs pure images and spaces. Concerning, three plays of Beckett – The lost Ones, Quad, and Ghost trio- we try to realize how the language and the body are exhausted and with image and space for defining again. So, how fatigue as mechanism does lead to thinking through the art and how does it cultivate the contemplation inside the society?